S. 1095
Enacts the 'Unborn Child Protection Act,' replacing South Carolina's 6-week abortion ban with a near-total prohibition from clinically detectable pregnancy, eliminating all rape/incest/fetal-anomaly exceptions, imposing felony penalties up to 20 years on providers, reclassifying mifepristone and misoprostol as Schedule IV controlled substances, and granting grandparents and siblings standing to sue for $10,000 per unlawful abortion.
Would be among the most restrictive abortion statutes in the United States: physicians and abortion-fund volunteers face felony prosecution, the judicial bypass for pregnant minors is repealed entirely, and widely used reproductive medications become Schedule IV controlled substances—burdening every pharmacy and hospital that stocks them for miscarriage management or postpartum hemorrhage treatment.
Prohibits all abortions from the point of clinically detectable pregnancy (when hCG indicates pregnancy) except in a narrowly defined medical emergency limited to preventing the pregnant woman's death or serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function; psychological and emotional conditions are explicitly excluded.
Bill textSection 44-41-610, Section 44-41-611, Section 44-41-640Eliminates all existing exceptions for rape, incest, and fatal fetal anomaly; the medical emergency provision in Section 44-41-640 is the sole permissible basis for abortion.
Bill textSection 44-41-640Makes performing an abortion a felony punishable by up to 20 years or $100,000. Section 44-41-670 separately bars criminal prosecution of pregnant women for undergoing an unlawful abortion, appearing to override a misdemeanor provision in Sec. 44-41-611 for the patient herself.
Bill textSection 44-41-611, Section 44-41-670Secs. 44-41-611 and 44-41-670 are in apparent tension; courts would need to reconcile them—the savings clause appears to control.Criminalizes administering, dispensing, or distributing abortion-inducing drugs (mifepristone, misoprostol, methotrexate) with intent to cause an unlawful abortion: felony up to 20 years for providers (Sec. 44-41-612) and up to 5 years for those who aid or distribute (Sec. 44-41-614). Exceptions exist for contraceptives and ectopic pregnancy treatment.
Bill textSection 44-41-610, Section 44-41-612, Section 44-41-614Narrow carve-outs may create clinical ambiguity for providers treating conditions where these drugs serve multiple purposes.Creates a private civil action for statutory damages of $10,000 per defendant plus compensatory, punitive damages and attorney fees; standing granted to the AG, solicitors, the pregnant woman, biological father, grandparents, siblings, and legal guardians of the unborn child. A separate wrongful death action is available under Section 15-51-15. Three-year statute of limitations.
Bill textSection 44-41-680, Section 15-51-15Adds mifepristone and misoprostol to South Carolina Schedule IV controlled substances (Section 44-53-250), effective 90 days after gubernatorial approval, applying to all dispensing of these drugs regardless of intended use.
Bill textSection 44-53-250Following Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022), South Carolina enacted a 6-week gestational limit. S.1095's sponsors seek to replace that limit with a conception-based prohibition and remove rape, incest, and fetal-anomaly exceptions present in current law.
LegisPlain analysisThe bill was introduced April 1, 2026, and the Senate Committee on Medical Affairs voted it out with amendment on April 21, 2026, placing it on the Senate floor calendar.
Official recordSupporters contend unborn children from clinical detectability gain legal personhood, including the ability for family members to bring wrongful death suits on their behalf.
LegisPlain analysisconfidence: mediumEnforceability depends on surviving constitutional challenge.Biological fathers, grandparents, siblings, and legal guardians of an unborn child gain new standing to bring civil suits for statutory and compensatory damages against providers and those who assist.
Bill textSection 44-41-680Physicians who perform abortions face felony charges of up to 20 years and $100,000, plus mandatory medical license suspension upon indictment and permanent revocation upon conviction.
Bill textSection 44-41-611, Section 44-41-690Abortion fund volunteers, clinic staff, and others who aid in providing or obtaining an unlawful abortion face felony charges of up to 5 years and a $5,000 fine.
Bill textSection 44-41-614Pregnant patients with pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, or carrying fetuses with fatal anomalies, have no exception and must continue their pregnancies or seek care outside South Carolina.
Bill textSection 44-41-640Pharmacies, hospitals, and clinics stocking mifepristone or misoprostol for any purpose—miscarriage management, postpartum hemorrhage, gastric ulcer treatment—must comply with Schedule IV controlled-substance dispensing and record-keeping requirements.
LegisPlain analysisFederal preemption or DEA scheduling may interact with this state-level classification.Section 44-53-250 reclassifies mifepristone and misoprostol as Schedule IV controlled substances, effective 90 days after gubernatorial approval. These FDA-approved drugs are used for miscarriage management, postpartum hemorrhage prevention, and gastric ulcer treatment—not only for abortion. Schedule IV status imposes dispensing, storage, and record-keeping requirements on every pharmacy and hospital that stocks them. The headline 'Prohibit Abortions' does not signal this controlled-substance reclassification.
Sources for this finding:The bill repeals Sections 44-41-32, 44-41-33, 44-41-34, and 14-8-200(b)(7), which provided a judicial bypass procedure allowing pregnant minors to seek court authorization for abortion without parental consent. Repeal eliminates this court-based alternative entirely, leaving minors no independent legal mechanism to obtain an abortion. This structural change is not indicated by the bill's title.
Sources for this finding:Section 44-41-680 grants standing to sue not only to the pregnant woman and biological father but also to the unborn child's grandparents, siblings, and legal guardians. Each may independently sue any person who performed or aided an unlawful abortion for $10,000 statutory damages per defendant, plus compensatory and punitive damages. Multiple simultaneous suits arising from a single procedure are structurally possible. This multi-plaintiff architecture is not apparent from the bill's title.
Sources for this finding:Section 59-32-30 mandates that South Carolina public school health education include 'a high-quality, computer generated rendering' of fetal development. This is a curriculum mandate affecting all public school students and is entirely separate from the abortion prohibition provisions. It is not indicated by the bill's title 'Prohibit Abortions.'
Sources for this finding:Enforcement is dual: criminal prosecution by the state (AG and solicitors) and private civil suits by a broad class of family-member plaintiffs, creating parallel public and private enforcement pressure.
Bill textSection 44-41-611, Section 44-41-680A physician invoking the medical emergency exception must document the medical basis in the patient's record within 30 days and make reasonable efforts to preserve the life of the unborn child when the child is living.
Bill textSection 44-41-640A physician indicted for violating this chapter faces mandatory license suspension during the criminal proceeding; conviction results in permanent license revocation.
Bill textSection 44-41-690The bill contains no direct appropriation or funding mechanism. No CBO, CRS, or South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office estimate was identified.
LegisPlain analysisAbortion providers are explicitly barred from receiving Medicaid family planning funds under Section 44-6-75, reducing federal and state reimbursements to entities that also perform abortions, including for non-abortion family planning services.
Bill textSection 44-6-75Federal Medicaid program conditions and Hyde Amendment rules may constrain or preempt this restriction.S.1095 lead sponsors Sens. Cash, Verdin, Fernandez, Kennedy, Garrett, and Rice (R): By defining 'unborn child' as 'an individual organism of the species homo sapiens from conception until live birth,' the bill reflects the sponsors' position that abortion constitutes the taking of a human life from the moment of pregnancy and warrants comprehensive criminal and civil accountability for all who perform, assist, or induce unlawful abortions.
Stakeholder claimCenter for Reproductive Rights: The bill criminalizes pregnant people, creates a dangerous chilling effect on healthcare providers through its narrow and ambiguous medical emergency exception, improperly reclassifies mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled substances despite no potential for substance abuse, and will disproportionately harm Black patients, rural residents, and low-income people. South Carolina already has one of the highest maternal death rates in the country at 29.5 per 100,000 live births, and this bill will worsen that crisis.
Stakeholder claimState Rep. Tiffany Spann-Wilder (D-Charleston): The bill eliminates all consideration of rape, incest, and fatal fetal anomalies as grounds for abortion: 'Rape, incest, fetal anomalies, none of that matters here.'
Stakeholder claimDr. Annie Andrews, pediatrician: Forcing women to carry high-risk pregnancies to term endangers their health and lives: 'Pregnancy is a high-risk medical condition. And when you force women to carry high-risk pregnancies...'
Stakeholder claimLeslie Rathbun, certified family nurse practitioner and midwife: Similar abortion bans in other states have already produced preventable maternal crises: 'In states that have already passed similar laws, I have watched women sit home to wait and come back in septic shock.'
Stakeholder claimThe Senate Committee on Medical Affairs approved S.1095 with amendment on April 21, 2026. The bill has not passed the full Senate or the House and has not been enacted into law.
Official recordWhether the full South Carolina Senate schedules a floor vote before the end of the 2025-2026 session, and whether the House takes up the bill if it passes the Senate.
LegisPlain analysisWhether a state constitutional challenge is filed under the South Carolina Constitution's right-to-privacy provisions if enacted, given the SC Supreme Court's prior contested rulings applying that right to abortion regulations.
LegisPlain analysisLitigation trajectory depends on enactment.Whether the Schedule IV reclassification of mifepristone and misoprostol survives federal preemption challenge, given FDA approval of these drugs for uses unrelated to abortion.
LegisPlain analysisconfidence: mediumNo litigation filed; anticipated challenge only.This decode is a snapshot. Bills change. Get emailed when this one is amended, voted on, or signed.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Find who represents you, get a call script, or share your view. LegisPlain doesn't tell you what to think — you pick support or oppose, we just give you the words.
Your address is used only for this lookup and is never stored.