LegisPlain/H.R. 1976
🇺🇸United StatesH.R. 1976119th CongressMar 24, 2026 · 1 view

Woman on the Twenty Act of 2025

This bill mandates that the $20 Federal Reserve note feature a portrait of Harriet Tubman on its front face, codifying into law a design change that was announced in 2016 but has been repeatedly delayed or reversed by successive administrations.

📋What It Does✅Benefits⚠️Impacts🔍Hidden Riders🎭Framing🚨Red Flags📍Status
📋

What It Does

This bill mandates that the $20 Federal Reserve note feature a portrait of Harriet Tubman on its front face, codifying into law a design change that was announced in 2016 but has been repeatedly delayed or reversed by successive administrations. It exists because the Treasury Secretary's currency design authority is discretionary — Congress has never before legislated a specific portrait — and supporters want to remove that discretion after the Trump administration shelved the Tubman design in both its first and second terms.

Amends 31 U.S.C. § 5114(b) to prohibit printing any $20 note after December 31, 2028, that does not prominently feature Harriet Tubman on the front face
Requires the Treasury Secretary to publicly release a preliminary design of the Tubman $20 note no later than December 31, 2026
Does not address the fate of Andrew Jackson's portrait currently on the $20 (whether he moves to the reverse or is removed entirely is left to Treasury's discretion)
Does not address the previously announced redesigns of the $5 or $10 notes that were part of the 2016 package
✅

Who Benefits

• Advocates for representation of women and Black Americans on U.S.

currency, a goal publicly pursued since at least 2015

Harriet Tubman's historical legacy and recognition, elevating her to the most-circulated high-denomination bill in everyday use
Congressional Democrats who have championed this change and can point to binding legislation rather than administrative promises
The general public, to the extent that currency reflecting broader American history is considered a public good
⚠️

Who Gets Hurt

The Trump administration loses discretionary control over this specific currency design decision if the bill becomes law
Andrew Jackson's placement on the front of the $20 is effectively terminated after 2028, which some supporters of Jackson or traditionalists will oppose
Bureau of Engraving and Printing faces a hard December 31, 2028 production deadline that may require significant advance planning and resource allocation regardless of other priorities
No identifiable private-sector party is materially harmed
🔍

Hidden Riders

None identified.

The bill is narrow and single-subject. The 'for other purposes' language in the title is standard drafting boilerplate and does not correspond to any additional substantive provision in the text.

🎭

Framing Analysis

• Framed as historic first representation of a woman on U.S.

paper currency — accurate as stated; no woman has appeared on general-circulation Federal Reserve notes, though women have appeared on coins (Susan B. Anthony dollar, Sacagawea dollar, etc.), so the framing is technically correct but somewhat incomplete

The findings section frames this as completing a bipartisan Obama-era commitment — the 2016 announcement was made under a Democratic administration, and the bill's 39 cosponsors are all Democrats, making the 'bipartisan promise' framing aspirational rather than descriptive of the current bill's support
The bill is straightforward about what it does; no significant mismatch between title and operative text
🚩

Red Flags

⚑No enforcement mechanism — the bill prohibits printing non-compliant notes after 2028 but specifies no penalty, fine, or agency consequence if Treasury simply ignores the deadline, leaving compliance dependent on political will or litigation
⚑The 2026 preliminary design deadline is administratively aggressive given that the current administration has shown no inclination to advance this design; Treasury could release a 'preliminary design' that is incomplete or inadequate and technically comply
⚑The bill does not appropriate funds for redesign and production costs, which are not trivial; currency redesigns typically cost tens of millions of dollars and take years of anti-counterfeiting engineering
⚑Leaves the back of the $20 entirely to Treasury discretion — the bill says nothing about Jackson's placement on the reverse, creating potential for a compromise design that minimizes the change
⚑No companion Senate bill is identified in the text, and the bill was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services, which is controlled by the Republican majority — the bill faces a steep path to floor consideration
📊

Current Status

H.R.

1976 was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 10, 2025, by Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) with 38 Democratic cosponsors. It was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. No committee hearing, markup, or vote has been scheduled as of the introduction date, and the Republican-controlled committee has not indicated it will take up the bill.

Civic Action

Tools to act on what you've learned

Share this report

Take action

Upgrade

Coming soon
Pro
$9/month
  • 📱
    SMS bill alertsText when your bills move
  • 📄
    PDF exportPrint-ready decode, shareable offline
  • 🔗
    Embed widgetLive decode card for your site
  • ✉️
    Send your rep's emailOne click — we send it via Resend
  • 📊
    Rep response tracker2-week follow-up: did they reply?
  • 🔔
    Follow unlimited billsEmail + SMS status updates
API$99/mo
  • ✓ Programmatic bill decode
  • ✓ Bulk analysis
  • ✓ JSON output
Decode another billDecoded by LegisPlain