📋
What It Does
H.R.
3633 is a sweeping overhaul of how the U.S. government regulates digital assets — primarily cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum — splitting jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC based on whether an asset is a 'security' or a 'digital commodity.' It also permanently bans the Federal Reserve from creating or issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC). The bill has been in development for years as the primary vehicle for resolving the long-running SEC/CFTC turf war over crypto.
Defines a new category — 'digital commodity' — as a digital asset intrinsically linked to a blockchain whose value derives from that blockchain's use, and places spot-market trading of digital commodities under CFTC jurisdiction
Creates a new exemption (Securities Act §4(a)(8)) allowing crypto issuers to sell investment contracts up to $50M/year without SEC registration, provided they commit to decentralizing (becoming a 'mature blockchain system') within 4 years
Establishes a 'mature blockchain system' certification: if an SEC-certified blockchain is not controlled by any person or group, its token trades as a commodity, not a security — effectively removing it from SEC oversight
Requires digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers to register with the CFTC within 90 days of CFTC adopting an expedited registration process, with 'provisional status' allowed during rulemaking
Explicitly exempts truly decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols from registration requirements at both the SEC and CFTC, provided no single party controls the protocol
Codifies the right of individuals to self-custody digital assets and conduct peer-to-peer transactions using hardware or software wallets
Exempts non-controlling blockchain developers from money transmitter classification solely for writing or maintaining blockchain software
Applies Bank Secrecy Act AML/KYC obligations to registered digital commodity brokers, dealers, and exchanges
Prohibits Federal Reserve banks from offering any account, payment, or financial services directly to individuals, and from issuing or indirectly facilitating a CBDC
Mandates numerous joint rulemakings by SEC and CFTC within 180–360 days of enactment
References and incorporates the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework for 'permitted payment stablecoins,' which are excluded from the 'digital commodity' definition
Includes a rule of construction explicitly stating that existing ethics laws prohibit members of Congress and senior executive branch officials from issuing digital commodities while in office
✅
Who Benefits
Cryptocurrency exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, etc.) — gain a clear federal regulatory framework and can operate under CFTC oversight, which is generally considered lighter than SEC regulation
Crypto token issuers — can raise up to $50M/year under a new exemption without full SEC registration, with a 4-year runway to decentralize before facing heavier scrutiny
DeFi protocol developers and users — protocols meeting the decentralization test are explicitly excluded from registration requirements at both agencies
Blockchain software developers — protected from money transmitter classification solely for writing or maintaining blockchain code
Individual crypto holders — self-custody rights codified in federal law; peer-to-peer transactions explicitly protected
Staking service providers — staking (including third-party custodial staking) is explicitly defined as an 'end user distribution,' not a securities offering, resolving years of regulatory uncertainty
Bitcoin and Ethereum holders — both assets are likely to qualify as 'digital commodities' under the mature blockchain system framework, removing them from SEC security classification
CFTC as an institution — gains substantial new jurisdiction and resources over the large spot crypto market, a role it previously lacked statutory authority for
Crypto venture capital and early investors — lock-up and resale rules for insiders are defined (12-month hold, volume caps), giving legal clarity for exits
Banking institutions — explicitly authorized to custody digital assets, resolving prior regulatory ambiguity
⚠️
Who Gets Hurt
SEC as an institution — loses jurisdiction over most major cryptocurrencies once they achieve 'mature blockchain' certification; its authority is narrowed to the initial issuance phase
Retail investors in early-stage crypto projects — the 4-year maturity window means buyers of tokens sold under the §4(a)(8) exemption have fewer protections than securities investors; if a project fails to decentralize, remedies are limited
State securities regulators — digital commodities are explicitly preempted from state securities laws under §308, stripping states of their traditional 'blue sky' investor protection authority over these assets
Federal Reserve — stripped of authority to develop a retail CBDC, potentially limiting U.S. competitiveness in digital payments infrastructure relative to China, the EU, and others already developing CBDCs
Consumers who might benefit from a CBDC — direct Fed accounts or digital dollar features are permanently foreclosed by Title VI
Investors defrauded by failed crypto projects — enforcement is split between two agencies with overlapping but non-identical powers; coordination failures are a real risk in a crisis
Competitors of U.S. crypto incumbents — expedited registration and provisional status rules create a first-mover advantage for currently operating (and often currently unregistered) platforms
🔍
Hidden Riders
Title VI ('Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act') is a complete standalone prohibition on Fed retail CBDC, bundled into what is nominally a market structure bill — CBDC policy is a separate, major monetary policy question being resolved via a crypto regulation vehicle
§111 (ethics rule of construction) states existing law already prohibits members of Congress from issuing digital commodities — this is included in a regulatory bill, likely in response to the Trump family's crypto ventures, but creates no new enforceable prohibition and is purely aspirational
§308 preempts ALL state securities laws for digital commodities — this is buried in a registration section but has sweeping federalism consequences, eliminating state investor protection authority over a multi-trillion dollar asset class
§203 declares secondary market sales of formerly-investment-contract digital commodities are NOT securities transactions under five federal statutes AND state law simultaneously — effectively legislating away SEC jurisdiction over secondary trading in one sentence
The bill explicitly cross-references and depends on the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework (§101 definitions) — meaning this bill's scope and definitions are partly defined by separate legislation that may or may not pass in its current form, creating a hidden dependency
§109 preempts state money transmitter laws for non-controlling blockchain developers — this overrides state-level regulatory frameworks (like New York's BitLicense) without a separate debate on federalism
§315 (Discretionary Surplus Fund) is listed in the table of contents for Title III but the text was truncated — its substance is unknown from the provided text
🎭
Framing Analysis
Called the 'Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act' — framing implies a CBDC would enable government surveillance of individuals, but the bill bans the Fed from offering accounts to individuals entirely, not just from surveilling them; it forecloses potential benefits (financial inclusion, payment efficiency) alongside any surveillance risk
Framed as providing 'regulatory clarity' — the bill does establish clearer rules, but it does so primarily by moving crypto from the stricter SEC framework to the lighter CFTC framework; 'clarity' and 'lighter regulation' are doing the same work here
The §111 ethics provision is framed as ensuring Congress cannot profit from the bill — but it adds no new prohibition and is explicitly non-binding ('rule of construction'); it is primarily political cover given the high-profile crypto activities of sitting members and the President's family
Self-custody protections (§105(c)) are framed as protecting individual rights — accurate as far as it goes, but the provision explicitly carves out sanctions, BSA, and AML enforcement, meaning the 'right' is narrower than the framing suggests
Framed as creating a path for tokens to 'mature' out of securities regulation — this is accurate, but the practical effect is that virtually any token team can use the §4(a)(8) exemption, raise $50M, and have 4 years before stricter requirements kick in, with SEC unable to act in the interim unless it affirmatively rebuts maturity certification within 60 days
🚩
Red Flags
⚑The 'mature blockchain system' certification becomes effective by default after 60 days unless the SEC actively objects — this flips the normal regulatory presumption: issuers get commodity treatment automatically unless the understaffed SEC acts fast, creating a de facto self-certification regime
⚑The 4-year maturity deadline has no hard enforcement mechanism beyond the SEC refusing to qualify future exempt offerings — a failed or abandoned project leaves investors with tokens that are neither proper securities nor regulated commodities
⚑Insider resale rules (§204) cap sales at 5–20% of insider-held tokens per year before maturity — but these percentages are set by future SEC rulemaking, meaning the actual lock-up rules are undefined at enactment
⚑The DeFi exclusion (§§309, 409) turns entirely on whether a protocol meets the decentralization test — the test involves complex technical and legal judgments that neither the SEC nor CFTC currently has staff or expertise to evaluate consistently
⚑Joint rulemaking requirements between SEC and CFTC number in the dozens, with most deadlines of 270–360 days — inter-agency agreement at this scale and speed is historically rare; if rulemakings are delayed, 'provisional status' entities operate without full rules for extended periods
⚑Provisional status (§106) allows currently unregistered exchanges to keep trading all existing listed assets until joint definition rulemakings are final — this could mean years of operation under minimal rules for platforms currently operating outside any regulatory framework
⚑The CBDC prohibition (Title VI) is permanent and statutory — reversing it would require an act of Congress, foreclosing future monetary policy flexibility regardless of future technological or geopolitical developments
⚑State securities law preemption (§308) is categorical — it eliminates the traditional state role as a first line of investor protection for crypto without substituting any comparable federal enforcement at the state level
⚑The bill's definitions of 'decentralized governance system' and 'mature blockchain system' exclude such systems from being considered 'persons' or 'groups under common control' — this could allow coordinated actors to use governance token votes to manipulate systems while escaping regulatory accountability
⚑Text was truncated before the full bill was available — §315 (Discretionary Surplus Fund), parts of §205 (maturity criteria), and Titles III–VI beyond the CBDC provisions are only partially or not available for analysis; key provisions may be present in the untransmitted text
📊
Current Status
H.R.
3633 passed the House during the 119th Congress and was received by the Senate on September 18, 2025, where it was referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. As of the document date, the bill is awaiting committee action in the Senate and has not been scheduled for a floor vote.
Civic Action
Tools to act on what you've learned
Share this report
Take action
Upgrade
Coming soon
Pro
$9/month
- 📱SMS bill alertsText when your bills move
- 📄PDF exportPrint-ready decode, shareable offline
- 🔗Embed widgetLive decode card for your site
- ✉️Send your rep's emailOne click — we send it via Resend
- 📊Rep response tracker2-week follow-up: did they reply?
- 🔔Follow unlimited billsEmail + SMS status updates
API$99/mo
- ✓ Programmatic bill decode
- ✓ Bulk analysis
- ✓ JSON output
Decode another billDecoded by LegisPlain